A Structured Approach to Creating Better Digital Experiences
Our methodology isn't about following rigid templates. It's about applying proven UX frameworks thoughtfully to your specific situation, creating clarity from complexity through structured collaboration.
Back to Home
// Evidence-Based Design
The Foundation of Our Approach
Our methodology builds on well-established UX principles adapted for real-world organizational contexts. These foundational beliefs guide every engagement.
Users First, Always
Every design decision should trace back to validated user needs. When opinions conflict, we return to user research for clarity. This principle keeps teams aligned on what truly matters.
Evidence Over Assumptions
We test ideas quickly rather than debating them endlessly. Putting prototypes in front of real users provides faster, more reliable answers than internal discussions ever could.
Collaborative Discovery
The best solutions emerge when diverse perspectives work together systematically. We create frameworks that enable productive collaboration rather than endless meetings.
Inclusive by Design
Accessibility isn't a checkbox at the end. We integrate inclusive design principles from the start, ensuring products work for everyone while meeting compliance standards naturally.
Speed Through Structure
Paradoxically, following structured processes enables faster progress. Time-boxed activities prevent analysis paralysis while maintaining thorough exploration of possibilities.
Knowledge Transfer Matters
We succeed when your team can continue without us. Every engagement includes teaching the frameworks behind our recommendations, building lasting organizational capability.
Why This Foundation Matters
These principles didn't emerge from theory alone. They developed through years of working with organizations facing real UX challenges. We've seen what works consistently across different industries, team sizes, and technical contexts. This foundation ensures our methodology adapts to your situation while maintaining effectiveness. When challenges arise during an engagement, these core beliefs guide us back to productive paths.
The Interface Lab Method
While each engagement is tailored to specific needs, our underlying process remains consistent. Here's how we transform UX challenges into validated solutions.
Understand & Align
Initial discovery phase
We begin by understanding your specific context through stakeholder interviews and existing research review. This phase identifies alignment gaps and establishes shared understanding of the challenge.
- → Stakeholder perspective mapping
- → Current state assessment
- → Success criteria definition
Research & Synthesize
User understanding development
We conduct focused user research appropriate to your timeline and resources. This might include interviews, usability testing, or accessibility audits depending on your needs.
- → User research execution
- → Pattern identification
- → Insight synthesis workshops
Ideate & Prioritize
Solution generation
Using structured ideation techniques, we generate diverse solutions collaboratively. Then we apply systematic prioritization to identify the most promising approaches worth prototyping.
- → Facilitated ideation sessions
- → Solution evaluation criteria
- → Prioritization frameworks
Prototype & Test
Rapid validation
We create testable prototypes at appropriate fidelity levels. Testing with real users provides validation before significant development investment, reducing risk substantially.
- → Prototype development
- → User testing sessions
- → Learning documentation
Refine & Specify
Detail development
Based on testing insights, we refine solutions and create detailed specifications. This includes interaction patterns, accessibility requirements, and design system components as needed.
- → Iterative refinement
- → Detailed specifications
- → Accessibility integration
Implement & Support
Transition to execution
We help transition validated designs to your development team with comprehensive documentation. Follow-up support ensures teams can apply the frameworks independently going forward.
- → Development handoff
- → Team training sessions
- → Follow-up consultation
Flexibility Within Structure
This framework adapts to different service types and timelines. A design sprint compresses these phases into five intensive days. An accessibility audit focuses heavily on research and specification phases. Design thinking workshops emphasize the understand, ideate, and prioritize stages. The underlying logic remains consistent while the implementation flexes to your needs.
Research and Standards Behind Our Work
Our methodology builds on decades of UX research and established industry standards. We don't reinvent the wheel—we apply proven approaches thoughtfully.
Established Frameworks We Draw From
Design Thinking (IDEO, Stanford d.school)
Our workshop facilitation builds on design thinking principles refined over 30+ years. The human-centered approach has proven effective across thousands of organizations globally.
Design Sprint Methodology (Google Ventures)
The five-day sprint format we use originated at Google Ventures and has been validated through hundreds of successful product launches since 2010.
WCAG 2.1 Accessibility Standards
Our accessibility work follows Web Content Accessibility Guidelines developed by W3C, the international standard for digital accessibility compliance.
Nielsen Norman Group Research
We incorporate usability heuristics and interaction patterns validated through NN/g's extensive user research spanning three decades.
Our Professional Standards
Certified Facilitation
All facilitators hold professional certifications in design thinking and design sprint methodologies from recognized institutions.
Accessibility Expertise
Our accessibility specialists maintain current WCAG 2.1 Level AA certification and conduct regular assistive technology testing.
Continuous Learning
We maintain active participation in UX research communities and regularly attend international conferences to stay current with evolving practices.
Quality Assurance
All deliverables undergo peer review to ensure they meet professional standards and serve your specific needs effectively.
Ethical Practice
We follow ethical guidelines for user research, ensuring informed consent and appropriate data handling in all research activities.
Why Research Foundation Matters
Grounding our work in established research means you're not betting on untested methods. These frameworks have been validated across diverse contexts and refined through rigorous application. We adapt proven approaches to your situation rather than experimenting with novel techniques on your time and budget.
Common Gaps in Traditional Product Development
Many organizations follow development approaches that made sense years ago but struggle with today's user expectations. Understanding these limitations helps explain why structured UX methodology creates such noticeable improvements.
What Often Happens
Assumption-Based Decisions
Teams build features based on stakeholder opinions or competitor analysis without validating actual user needs. This often results in products nobody finds intuitive or useful.
Lengthy Debate Cycles
Without user data to ground discussions, teams spend weeks debating design decisions. These meetings rarely reach true consensus, just eventual exhaustion.
Accessibility as Afterthought
Accessibility gets addressed only when complaints arise or compliance deadlines loom. Retrofitting accessibility is always more expensive and less effective than building it in from the start.
Build First, Learn Later
Organizations invest heavily in development before testing concepts with users. Discovering fundamental flaws after launch means costly rework or living with suboptimal solutions.
How Our Approach Differs
Evidence-Driven Direction
User research provides concrete data that resolves debates and builds consensus naturally. Teams align around validated insights rather than personal preferences.
Structured Collaboration
Facilitated frameworks enable productive collaboration in hours rather than weeks. Time-boxing and clear decision criteria prevent analysis paralysis.
Inclusive from Foundation
Accessibility standards integrate into design decisions from day one. This ensures compliance naturally while broadening your product's reach from launch.
Validate Before Building
Rapid prototyping and user testing happen before significant development investment. This reduces risk substantially while ensuring resources go toward validated solutions.
A Respectful Perspective
Traditional approaches made sense in their time and context. Many organizations simply haven't had the opportunity to experience alternative methods. The differences we highlight aren't about criticizing how others work—they're about showing what becomes possible when user-centered frameworks guide product development systematically.
Our Distinctive Approach
While we build on established UX frameworks, several aspects of our methodology set us apart. These differences emerge from years of refining our approach based on what actually helps organizations succeed.
Teaching Over Dependency
We deliberately focus on knowledge transfer. Every engagement includes teaching the frameworks we use, enabling your team to continue applying UX methods independently after we're gone.
Contextual Adaptation
We don't impose rigid processes. The frameworks adapt to your organizational culture, technical constraints, and timeline realities while maintaining methodological rigor.
Comprehensive Documentation
Every engagement produces detailed documentation that serves as ongoing reference. We capture not just the outcomes but the reasoning behind decisions.
Built-In Accessibility
Accessibility isn't a separate service—it's integrated into everything we do. WCAG compliance becomes a natural outcome rather than a separate initiative.
Measurable Frameworks
We establish clear metrics for tracking progress from the start. This enables evidence-based assessment of whether our approaches are delivering value.
Honest Communication
If we're not the right fit for a challenge, we'll say so and suggest alternatives. We'd rather refer you to someone better suited than take on work where we can't deliver value.
Continuous Improvement
How We Keep Evolving
- • Post-engagement surveys help us understand what worked and what could improve
- • Internal retrospectives after each engagement capture lessons learned
- • Active participation in UX research community exposes us to emerging practices
- • Regular review of our documentation and templates keeps materials current
What Stays Constant
- • User-centered decision making as core principle
- • Evidence over assumptions in design choices
- • Teaching and knowledge transfer as priority
- • Accessibility as integrated requirement, not afterthought
How We Measure Success Together
Success means different things for different organizations. Our approach to measurement adapts to your priorities while maintaining clear visibility into progress.
Metrics We Track
User Experience Indicators
- → Task completion rates and success paths
- → Time on task and efficiency improvements
- → Error rates and confusion points
- → Satisfaction scores and qualitative feedback
Team Performance Metrics
- → Decision-making speed and confidence
- → Stakeholder alignment levels
- → Rework and iteration frequency
- → Team capability and independence
Accessibility Compliance
- → WCAG conformance levels achieved
- → Critical issue resolution rates
- → Assistive technology compatibility
- → User diversity and reach expansion
What Success Looks Like
We define success criteria collaboratively at engagement start. These typically include:
- Clear Direction: Team has validated roadmap with user backing
- Actionable Insights: Research findings translate to specific improvements
- Team Capability: Internal teams can apply frameworks independently
- Documented Process: Comprehensive reference materials available
- Measurable Impact: Baseline metrics show improvement trajectory
Setting Realistic Expectations
We're transparent about what's achievable within different timeframes:
Proven UX Methodology for Sustainable Digital Product Success
Interface Lab's methodology combines established UX frameworks with practical adaptations developed through years of working with diverse organizations. Our approach builds on research from design thinking pioneers at IDEO and Stanford, design sprint methodologies from Google Ventures, and accessibility standards from W3C. This foundation ensures you're investing in proven methods rather than experimental approaches.
What distinguishes our methodology is the emphasis on knowledge transfer and contextual adaptation. While many consultancies create dependency, we deliberately teach teams the frameworks behind our recommendations. This investment in capability building means organizations continue benefiting from UX methods long after our engagement concludes. Our facilitators hold professional certifications in design thinking and accessibility, bringing credentialed expertise to every engagement.
Based in Larnaca, Cyprus, we've refined our approach across healthcare, education, government, and technology sectors. Each engagement strengthens our understanding of how UX methodology applies in different organizational contexts. The flexibility within our structured process allows adaptation to timeline constraints, budget considerations, and cultural factors while maintaining methodological rigor.
Our methodology addresses common gaps in traditional product development: assumption-based decisions, lengthy debate cycles, accessibility as afterthought, and building before validating. By structuring collaboration systematically, facilitating evidence-based decisions, and integrating accessibility from the start, we help organizations avoid these costly patterns. The measurable improvements our methodology delivers stem from this fundamental shift in approach.
Success with UX methodology requires commitment from both sides. We bring structured frameworks, facilitation expertise, and evidence-based practices. Organizations contribute domain knowledge, user access, and willingness to test assumptions. This collaboration produces validated solutions that serve real user needs while building internal team capability for continued success.
Explore How Our Methodology Applies to Your Situation
Understanding your specific context helps us determine whether our approach would serve your needs effectively. Share your situation, and we'll have an honest conversation about potential fit.
Discuss Your Challenge